{"id":19792,"date":"2011-12-15T10:11:10","date_gmt":"2011-12-15T09:11:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/naider.com\/naiderlab\/urbanismo-adaptativo-es-tiempo-de-mientras-tanto\/"},"modified":"2023-04-24T13:41:26","modified_gmt":"2023-04-24T11:41:26","slug":"adaptive-urbanism-its-meanwhile-time","status":"publish","type":"naiderlab","link":"https:\/\/naider.com\/en\/naiderlab\/knowledge\/articles\/adaptive-urbanism-its-meanwhile-time\/","title":{"rendered":"Adaptive urbanism. It’s meanwhile time"},"content":{"rendered":"

I am sharing here the document that I used yesterday at the congress debate tableEQUIciuDAD<\/a>, as well as some notes on the discussion we had, which I think completed my initial introduction well. A brief account of some conditions of the current city -fragmentary, subjective but significant at the end of the day- and a definition of the functions of what we address in the workshop asadaptive urbanism<\/a> along with a series of examples. The idea of \u200b\u200bpresenting these elements at the beginning was to provoke, above all, a debate around the thesis that in current conditions, with an urban agenda limited by the lack of economic resources on the part of public institutions and the end of large projects of intervention in the city, we are facing the best conditions to see how alternative strategies can be found. These strategies and actions are going to be more capable of adapting to the new conditions because they have proven -in times against the current- that they are viable and effective. From the transition cities<\/a> to the infrastructure recovery< \/a> for public use, passing through projects like Renew Newcastle<\/a>, Meanwhile Project<\/ a>, Solar Footprint<\/a> or 596 acres<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\n
\"\"<\/a><\/div>\n